The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Geschichte (
talk) 21:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
No references found for this single line article, does not meet
WP:GNG. Found this one link -
[1], and I don't think it is
WP:RSNasty Tunes of Sally (
talk) 23:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep I removed the cn and added 2 refs so the subject certainly exists and is covered in Indian history type websites, the article could surely use expansion by someone knowledgeable from the Indian articles task force to bring it up to at least start class. Also it seems a subsequently blocked sock removed a fair amount of content in April of this year so maybe something can be retreived by someone in the know.
JW 1961Talk 20:10, 21 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment As another editor has examined the deleted content mentioned above and found nothing of value, it would appear that deletion is now the most reasonable outcome.
JW 1961Talk 17:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Eddie891TalkWork 17:40, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Sources are
WP:SPS websites and the
historical disputes that caste articles attract means that we should demand high-quality reliable sources for such articles. This sub-stub has little to no value and a redirect to
Rajput would only be viable if we had substantive sources to declare that the identification was correct.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 19:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Given the limited participation until after the second relist, giving this one more relist to ensure that there is a delete consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 18:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete The references in the article are not
WP:RS so they do not verify its notability. I looked at the material removed in April and did not find usable sources. Google produced one passing mention, and JSTOR and NYT did not produce sources.
Z1720 (
talk) 22:16, 8 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.