The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 09:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)reply
does not seem notable. "is the first and only $10M+ brokerage firm with no independent agents" doesn't automatically make it notable, and even that statement has a failed statement tag on it.
◊PRAHLADbalaji (
M•T•A•
C) This message was left at 23:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Draftify The references might yield enough material for a viable article, but it isn't ready for mainspace yet. DGG (
talk ) 01:01, 4 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Draftify and salt name My concern is that the article would be moved back to mainspace without sufficient improvement and we'll be having this discussion again in the near future. --
John B123 (
talk) 15:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)reply
'Draftify' this requires more information to be visible on Wikipedia
Author Sanju (
talk) 01:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:NCORP. Lacks in-depth coverage in multiple, independent, reliable secondary sources.----
Pontificalibus 06:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:TNT and
WP:SPAM. A real article can not be made from this mess.
Bearian (
talk) 19:30, 9 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.