- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Vanamonde ( Talk) 18:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Benild Joseph
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Benild Joseph ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable cracker. The majority of the sources are pieces he wrote, and the rest are either name-drops or stuff he says. Two are 404-compliant (one of which is a newspaper clipping that returns a service-specific "this image doesn't exist" placeholder). Google News returns nothing (String: "Benild Joseph"). — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 22:46, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 00:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 00:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 00:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be sourced to 3rd party sources. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: Barely found anything about him aside from being talked about in a book. ASTIG😎 ( ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep The subject has been significantly covered by quite a number of sources, so i don't think this is not a valid reason for deletion. Please review, i can add more relevant sources. Book he authored can be found here [1]. A case for deletion could be made under WP:GNG with sufficient analysis of the sources. Mark ( talk) 17:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- The sources in the article are not third-party significant coverage, and anything he authored is useless for notability as Wikipedia defines it. — A little blue Bori v^_^v Hasteur Hasteur Ha-- oh.... 21:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.