- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 ( talk) 02:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Ben Goertzel
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ben Goertzel ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability concerns for this person; article reads like a resume. References about him seem to be mostly his own content. He appeared on Joe Rogan's podcast but that doesn't demonstrate notability. power~enwiki ( π, ν) 22:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett ( talk) 09:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett ( talk) 09:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett ( talk) 09:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. Has (co-)written 14 books, one was reviewed in the New York Times; has been written about in the Wall Street Journal [1] and twice in the New York Times [2] [3]. AxelBoldt ( talk) 03:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. as per 'Notability (academics)'. It reads a little like an ad but still a notable person. ( Dushan Jugum ( talk) 09:20, 19 January 2019 (UTC)).
- Keep. You don't have to agree with him to see that he is notable. Books, conferences - he was on Joe Rogan because he is a known quantity in singularity and transhumanist circles with a recognizable point of view. Wetwarexpert ( talk) 19:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: Reviews of his work seem limited but there's a couple of additional ones [4] [5]. For weight against WP:NACADEMIC, citations of his work are at Google Scholar. ~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 10:19, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.