The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 00:50, 26 June 2023 (UTC)reply
This of course is not a great incentive for deletion, but people have repeatedly tried to add to the article (as evidenced by the
talk page and the edit history) warnings about it being used as part of a confidence scam. Unfortunately, Wikipedia has no policy or procedure against this kind of usage. —
OttoMäkelä (
talk) 15:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is any additional support for suggested Merge. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 00:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep. Her
Bloomberg Billionaires Index entry provides reasonably substantial coverage from a strong RS. Combined with the sources in the article this seems to meet the
GNG. At the risk of stating the obvious,
WP:NOTINHERITED does not stand for the proposition that heirs cannot be notable as such. As to the suggested merge, merging biographies tends to be suboptimal as it mucks up things like categories. As we have enough here for a modest article, I don't think a merge is warranted. The use of the page for scammery is IMO an important concern, but maybe more of an
RFPP issue. --
Visviva (
talk) 19:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Right now, I see no consensus for any particular outcome. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 01:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:BASIC as article has been expanded since it was first nominated and there are more sources now offering a bit of substantive information about this notoriously private individual. In a world where "
fake German heiress" gets 150,000+ pageviews per month, it seems reasonable to keep the article about a real German heiress, who also happens to be the fifth richest woman in the world, who gets 10,000+ pageviews per month.
Cielquiparle (
talk) 07:18, 10 July 2023 (UTC)reply
Keep Thanks to the kind effort of
Cielquiparle and
Eastmain, the article passes
WP:GNG. With 10,284 pageviews in the past 30 days, our readers are clearly interested in the subject, and we should be aiming to produce the best BLP-compliant article we reasonably can.
Edwardx (
talk) 13:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.