From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. ( Non-administrator closure.) NorthAmerica 1000 12:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Beat on the Brat

Beat on the Brat (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The info in this article is redundant, because the Ramones (album) article already discusses basically everything on this page. Johnny338 ( talk) 18:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages because they too have basically no new info that wasn't discussed in the Ramones (album) article. While Havana Affair has some differing info, it only briefly discusses the Red Hot Chili Peppers cover, and that info is sparse, with only one source that shows the release format:

Judy Is a Punk (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Now I Wanna Sniff Some Glue (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Havana Affair (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Keep - Beat on the Brat has a significant number of book and magazine references (as evidenced in the find sources links above). It has been covered and has been alluded to in pop culture. In my opinion, the other songs should not be included in this nomination, as they may or may not be notable.- Mr X 19:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Beat on the nominator (no, I shouldn't say that); make that Keep per MrX. Newyorkbrad ( talk) 20:57, 11 June 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Withdrawn by nominator per MrX, I should have looked for reliable sources before nominating. Stupid of me! Anyways, could someone please close this nomination? Thank you very much! Johnny338 ( talk) 02:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.