The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 21:38, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Battle of Chamb and Dogra

Battle of Chamb and Dogra (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another unsourced and non-notable battle which fails basic WP:GNG. There is no reliable source on google books, some passing mentions of these places don't deserve separate article. Human3015 ^TALK  22:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  22:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  22:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Human3015 ^TALK  22:32, 3 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• delete as nonverifiable. Staszek Lem ( talk) 03:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete article is original research, if it was any notable it should have contained a few references or potential sources. D4iNa4 ( talk) 11:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete- As per nomination. — Sanskari ^Hangout 14:41, 24 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.