From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn (non-admin closure)

Battle Fever J

Battle Fever J (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This and nine other articles listed below may be controversial nominees that would be accusations of WP:IDONTLIKEIT for deletion but some of these articles are WP:FANCRUFT that have been also been tagged as WP:OR and references that may only interest a particular audience with in-universe information for years now. While these may be notable Japanese programs that include three that were adopted into seasons for Power Rangers back in the late 90s/early 2000s. I'm thinking maybe perhaps to avoid deletion maybe WP:BLOWITUP these articles to avoid having things that are better suitable for RangerWiki be a part of them.

And here the nine other related articles for the same reasons listed.:

Pahiy ( talk) 01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Pahiy ( talk) 01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Pahiy ( talk) 01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Pahiy ( talk) 01:29, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Question for Pahiy: None of the essays that you cite are reasons to delete a page. The relevant policy is WP:NTV, which says "Generally, an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television channel with a broad regional or national audience." All of these series aired on national television in Japan. If they are notable in Japan, then they are notable for English Wikipedia. Why do you think that these ten shows fail WP:NTV? —  Toughpigs ( talk) 03:13, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Notable TV shows, and the articles are not in such a shape that TNT is needed. Just deleting or stubbing the character sections would resolve 99% of the fancruft issue. Jumpytoo Talk 03:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All - Just to start, bundling all of these articles together as a single nomination was probably not a great idea since the amount of coverage for each individual series varies quite a bit. Case in point, while some of the more obscure entries here have very little in English sources, there are ones like "Taiyo Sentai Sun Vulcan" that actually do, due to the involvement of Stan Lee in trying to get the license to bring it to the United States long before Power Rangers became a thing. And that's just taking English sources into account - as the shows were aired in Japan, there is certainly a lot more information in Japanese sources. Each of these series' equivalent pages on the Japanese Wikipedia have a number of sources being cited, and while a quick look with Google Translate shows that many of them are not actually from reliable sources, there are some on each article that look like they are. As stated by Jumpytoo, pretty much all of the issues regarding Fancruft in these article can be easily solved by removing the extensive sections on the robots/monsters/characters. The remainder of the articles, such as the episode lists, cast, etc, are pretty standard pieces of information for articles on TV series. Rorshacma ( talk) 16:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Withdrawn by nominator Withdrawing the article from deletion, Moving discussion about this to televison. Pahiy ( talk) 18:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.