The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (
talk) 01:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Bart Locanthi is, as an AES and ASA fellow, and AES Gold Medal recipient, very notable.
Pent112 (
talk) 10:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
That's not notability. If you want to easily prove
Alan Liefting's pretty much nonexistent rationale false, cite multiple independent reliable sources that cover this person's life and works in depth. I see that you had already cited one (a page-long article in the JAES) before the article was even nominated. Cite some more. You'll give the closing administrator something clearly and strongly founded in
deletion policy to hang xyr hat on, which
cannot be said of that nomination rationale.
Sources!
Sources!
Sources!
Uncle G (
talk) 11:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep, it says he's a guy of vision and genius.
MyDog22 (
talk) 11:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
A search of Bart Locanthi with google delivered hundreds of hits. A few of them:
That's more like it. That gives the discussion specific sources to address. If you can find and cite sources that are primarily about Locanthi, discussing him in depth, that will help to make your case watertight.
Uncle G (
talk) 12:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Keep Sources are available to establish notability. --Jmundo 20:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.