- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. The article has been improved enough and this is but going in only one direction:) (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 12:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Bari, Himachal Pradesh
- Bari, Himachal Pradesh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It seems that the creator is trying to promote a place or some organization by linking link to an external URL, all through the article. Also searches turn up to show that the subject is not a town, but just a road. I couldn't find any census listing as well. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 11:19, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 11:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 11:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment – Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, your deletion rationale is wrong. Bari is a village in Rohru subdistrict of Himachal Pradesh's Shimla District – see here – as correctly mentioned in the article. The article as of now contains basic stats & info of the village, although some of it is unsourced. In fact, your nomination seems to meet WP:SKCRIT#3. BTW, I've removed the google map links mentioned by you. - NitinMlk ( talk) 17:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep – I don't see any valid deletion rationale here. Article just needed some clean-up which I've already done. And the subject is obviously notable, per WP:GEOLAND. - NitinMlk ( talk) 18:53, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Strong and speedy keep per WP:GEOLAND. GSS ( talk| c| em) 14:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND as a populated village, this shouldnt have been nominated with census info included from the very beginning, i note that the article creator appears to be from the village, see User:Vivekdewanta, who obviously loves where they are from, so article cleanup is appropriate, not afd nomination. Coolabahapple ( talk) 00:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GEOLAND. ‐‐ 1997kB ( talk) 03:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Measures up to GEOLAND. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 22:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.