The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)reply
I failed to find in-depth coverage so we can write without
WP:OR. If the invention is notable then we should have an article on the invention which we have but not on him. Fails
WP:GNG.
Störm(talk) 16:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete nothing even close to meeting notability criteria for academics.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing to indicate notability under
WP:PROF or the
WP:GNG. Article was written by a now-blocked user with a history of poor quality contributions on Kurdish-related topics. –
Joe (
talk) 11:37, 9 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.