The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
WaltonOne 14:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Merge into the
Thomas the Tank Engine article. Doesn't seem to show anything other than there is merchandise for sale. Rev. Awdry spinning in grave no doubt.
Mandsford 00:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The Editor: Look, I put references in here and you want it gone! It isn't helpful to have nothing when you could have up to date facts. —The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
202.67.123.8 (
talk) 00:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete sole reference is a primary source. Frankly, this isn't
notable if it doesn't have other secondary and tertiary
reliable sources. In response to the IP's comment, that had no teeth and is
invalid. (→O -RLY?) 02:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.