- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
BCC Research
AfDs for this article:
- BCC Research ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:CORP: fails to establish notability; all citations are in-passing mentions, ditto for past 6 months of hits on HighBeam. Brianhe ( talk) 09:52, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: A WP:SPA article by User:Bccresearch1, with routine announcements and profiles as references, which confirm a firm going about its business, nothing more. No evidence of notability found. AllyD ( talk) 11:40, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- I had forgotten that this article came up in a weird COI case archived here. It probably has no bearing on the content now, involving an off-wiki campaign to promote some articles and delete other ones including this. Other editors might want to know. - Brianhe ( talk) 13:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Brianhe ( talk) 23:33, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, bad sourcing and no evidence of WP:NCORP - David Gerard ( talk) 00:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.