- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 09:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Ayyeka
- Ayyeka ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. All the sources given are either press releases, blog posts, directory listings, or not about the company at all. Prod contested by author. shoy ( reactions) 12:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 01:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I removed some promotional hype and added data with solid references, which I found with no problem at all. There is plenty more that can be added to improve the article. Water technology is a a global issue and information about new technologies should be on Wikipedia. So I see no valid grounds for deletion.-- Geewhiz ( talk) 06:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 06:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 01:24, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- a typical advertorial on an unremarkable company ("Awards and Recognition", etc etc). Sources are insufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
:Keep as above. My position has not changed on this. I added information and sources, and believe that the article is worthy.--
Geewhiz (
talk) 10:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC) - Duplicate !vote
- Comment -- all the coverage I see is either about the partnerships, awards or exhibitions, which suggest that the company is not yet notable. K.e.coffman ( talk) 07:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CORPDEPTH. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 18:43, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.