The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.
Michig (
talk) 07:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)reply
A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, interviews, commercial websites, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet
WP:PORNBIO /
WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre.
First AfD closed as no consensus in 2008. PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then, and I believe it's a good time to revisit.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete as non notable porno actress, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –
Davey2010Talk 02:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete does not meet our current, and still far too inclusive, notability guidelines for this profession.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:22, 12 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.