The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 18:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)reply
What appears to be a non-notable software that didn't make much of an impact in its few years of existence. My searches found some results
here,
here,
here and
here. The article is sourced so I'm not sure if this can make it passable and moving elsewhere is not possible as there's no good target.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
JAaron95 (
Talk) 13:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: Originally a
WP:SPA article created during the company's active life. All I am seeing is routine announcements (funding, partnership, demise) which falls short of
WP:CORPDEPTH.
AllyD (
talk) 07:09, 1 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.