The result was keep. Re-write has helped. X-Y's are not inherently notable for articles, but this one certainly is now. Many "delete" calls now changes. Strength of overwhelming Keep arguments and article is now significant ( non-admin closure) ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 19:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Yet another in a line of unsourced, "X-Y relations" stubs. In this instance, Australia and Uguguay are a long way away from each other and don't seem to have any overlapping diplomatic interests. This topic does not pass any of the notability guidelines when one considers this topic on its own; yes, newspaper articles can be found that ministers from australia and uruguay have exchanged hearty handshakes and pleasantries together, but this diplomatic relationship is not one of verifiable notability. That something can be verfied does not make it independently notable. Bali ultimate ( talk) 11:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC) reply
*Delete The article in it's current state does not talk about relations between Australia and Uruguay. Basically it just says that the countries have consulates in the other country, and that they're part of 2 common organizations. Hardly encyclopedic material. Most of the links given in the talk page are not independent of the subject, and those that are would probably come under
WP:NOT#NEWS as non-notable news events.
Anti
venin 14:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
reply