The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete all per nom. These are not notable topics, or an appropriate use of Wikipedia
Nick-D (
talk) 11:44, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep all per nom. Wikipedia has articles on topics which are far less notable than this, "list of worst TV shows" for instance. A page which details international relations treaties is an important part of detailing the history of the nations who are a party to that treaty. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
58.104.92.132 (
talk) 02:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 09:01, 17 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Deleteand merge, the information could be put in under the Australia part of
Foreign relations of Guatemala, there aren't that many bilateral treaties between these two countries, not enough for a whole page.
Socerb102 (
talk) 18:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.