The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Davewild (
talk) 11:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)reply
This article, created by an SPA, is about a business in the world of finance. There are eight pages of ghits, and I can't see anything I'd consider a reliable independent source. It seems to be mostly PR or mentions. The references provided are 16 to the company's own site, and four that appear to be mentions or PR based. I can see no claim to notability in the article.
Peridon (
talk) 17:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: There was also
Draft:Austen Morris Associates created earlier by another SPA which reached its G13 date, having been declined as being an advert. When deleting it, I added G11 to the G13 reason as it was pure spam.
Peridon (
talk) 17:20, 20 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete Clearly promotional. Most of the links comes from the official website.
Noteswork (
talk) 03:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep We have removed the promotional references and will continue to add relevant content and references. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kevinspmann (
talk •
contribs)
Keep We have now removed all promotional references. There are now 10 external references. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kevinspmann (
talk •
!vote struck through as account has !voted already. Please note you are allowed one keep or delete, and anything else must be a Comment. Also, please make sure you are signed in when posting, and please sign posts here with ~~~~.
Peridon (
talk) 19:02, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123(utter) @ 15:58, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. The article is clearly promotional in nature. It was also without a doubt written by someone affiliated with the company.
-- Calidum 17:27, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete: "we", "our" and vapour emission about meeting demand and strong knowledge, blah blah. If a firm wants to advertise, they can probably just afford to buy webspace; this isn't a free-hosting site. They're an IFA firm, so are many others. They do business, well so does any firm. Routine announcements and the occasional trade press profile confirm existence but do not amount to
encyclopaedic notability.
AllyD (
talk) 21:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Apparently they didn't know how to write on Wiki, maybe give some time to return the entry to normal.
Rebelboyl (
talk) 03:26, 29 December 2014 (UTC) —
Rebelboyl (
talk •
contribs) has made
few or no other edits outside this topic. reply
Delete: Cheap promotion, get it there in the yellow pages instead. Faizan 09:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.