From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect all to the respective municipality articles. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 05:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Aurelio, San Jose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Aurelio, San Jose (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a barangay in Dinagat Islands does not pass WP:GNG. There is no inheritance of notability for most of 40 K+ barangays in the Philippines. This had been a contested area of WikiProject Philippines (seen here), but recent consensus reinforces the de facto perspective in which barangays shall be notable only by case to case basis, especially through reliable sources.

All sources given here are unreliable ( Google Maps, website that lists a school in the barangay, and same website that lists another school of the barangay. If link is desired, it is recommended to just redirect this to San Jose, Dinagat Islands#Barangays. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 04:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 04:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply

I am also nominating the following related pages under Category:Barangays of Dinagat Islands for the same reasons as above:

1) Barangays of Basilisa

2) of Cagdianao

3) of Libjo

4) of San Jose, Dinagat Islands

5) of Tubajon

_ JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 04:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Additional comments added by me JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 05:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply

Poll and discussion

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect all to their respective municipalities which have lists of barangays. Such articles to list a school in the neighborhood are not necessary, though no prejudice against recreation if there is substantive coverage about the barangays themselves. Reywas92 Talk 14:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect is the best conclusion. All of these pages are extremely unnecessary. RPC7778 ( talk) 16:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect all as per nom and comments above. Notability must be demonstrated, not inherited. WP:GEOLAND does not guarantee a settlement's notability. — hueman1 ( talk • contributions) 00:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Redirect all to their respective municipalities which at least have references. -- Lenticel ( talk) 01:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aurelio,_San_Jose&oldid=1034846501"