The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 19:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Yet another rail siding/station, now (according to one not-officially-reliable source) reduced to crossovers. Until fairly recently there was nothing much around it except section roads, but recently some houses have been built a bit to the west, and the location of the name on the map has wandered around between the two spots Will Croft Barnes claims it was originally called "Aubrey" and was changed to "Audrey" to eliminate duplication of another place name, but he admits that it's "spelled Audley" and that's what everyhting I've found has called it.
Mangoe (
talk) 19:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete whenever something is said to be a populated place but there is no estimation of what the population is things look suspicious.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 15:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - No sign of a notable populated place here. Recent nearby development is unrelated to whatever may have been here in the past. –
dlthewave☎ 18:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Several references to it as a rail siding but no indication that it was ever populated. Found one reference that said it was meant to be named Aubrey, in reference to Aubrey Valley which lies just to the east.
Glendoremus (
talk) 20:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.