The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
assume good faith on the part of others and to
sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
Delete Couldn't find any reliable sources covering the game, either as AtWar or Afterwind. Doesn't seem like there's even a Metacritic page for it. --
ferret (
talk) 21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
There is a Metacritic page, it's incorrectly titled:
[1]. There's no reviews though so no help in showing notability, I can't find any significant coverage from reliable video game sources. --
The1337gamer (
talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Restore to Redirect i can't believe I'm saying this but this started as a not too bad Neelix redirect to a Iraqi journalist who was murdered and received several press freedom awards. This game is at least as notable as your typical pageant winner.
Legacypac (
talk) 04:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Restoring the redirect sounds okay to me --Usien6msg •
his 14:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete for now at best as nothing from the current article suggests even minimally better notabiltiy and improvement with my searches finding nothing better at all. Notifying
Meters who has frequented this article as shown by the history.
SwisterTwistertalk 05:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete on notability grounds.
User:SwisterTwister I noticed the redirect being turned into an article (hence no new page review) and I was just keeping an eye on it to keep the worse of the junk out while I waited to see if the authors would make any reasonable claim to notability. I didn't see any signs of it turning into a useful article, so I punted to the nominator to see if he or she knew of any reliable sources (games are not my area).
Meters (
talk) 07:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Forgot to say, Neelix or no, I don't object to restoring the original redirect if it's useful. In fact, if this article were to survive (as unlikely as that seems) the article should be "AtWar" rather than "Atwar", leaving the redirect still available.
Meters (
talk) 07:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as failing
WP:GNG with no reliable, secondary, in-depth sources, such as
WP:VG/RS. It appears all the current sourcing is either primary or unreliable (user-based). I cannot find any more sources for either title. The article is primarily
WP:GAMECRUFT. Original redirect seems reasonable. —
HELLKNOWZ ▎
TALK 16:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.