- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Asterix games#Video games. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 05:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Asterix: Mega Madness
- Asterix: Mega Madness ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Videogameplayer99 ( talk) 03:53, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom, couldn't find enough significant sources. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 04:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Amazing lack of sources given how popular Asterix is, I suppose it must have been *. pun intended! Α Guy into Books™ § ( Message) - 12:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Search by myself didn't turn up anything relevant for an encyclopedic article.-- SamHolt6 ( talk) 21:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- The game existed and as such is a plausible search term. Per both
WP:GNG and
WP:ATD, redirect to
List of Asterix games#Video_games. --
Izno (
talk) 04:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Per
WP:COSTLY there is no real need for one, as it redirects to a list of unrelated games. If the list had summaries of each game I might think differently.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 02:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Comparing the list entry to the current article, it duplicates almost all the information - release year, publisher, and platforms. The only thing missing is multi/single player. Argento Surfer ( talk) 14:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- WP:Don't worry about performance. You should also read WP:RGUIDE; notably, the first and second sentences. WP:RFD#Keep also makes for good reading. -- Izno ( talk) 12:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Per
WP:COSTLY there is no real need for one, as it redirects to a list of unrelated games. If the list had summaries of each game I might think differently.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 02:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect per Izno Argento Surfer ( talk) 17:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect per Izno. f e minist 13:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect per Izno. I just read COSTLY and disagree with every centimeter of it. L3X1 (distænt write) 01:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Asterix games#Video_games. Redirects are cheap and as it exists it's plausible someone will search for it. Redirection → deletion, when possible. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 02:23, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.