The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Good marketing, nothing significant to cover her on Wikipedia. If her business is notable then create a separate article. Fails
WP:GNG.
Fhektii (
talk) 10:43, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
Ashley Black's FasciaBlaster: Non-notable individual, no coverage outside of lawsuits for the FasciaBlaster. No book reviews found, only where to buy them, so not passing AUTHOR. Redirect seems fine as notability is only around the Blaster product.
Oaktree b (
talk) 15:03, 7 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect to Ashley Black's FasciaBlasterFasciaBlaster, which appears to be a notable
WP:PRODUCT. As to this article, there does not appear to be significant coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources about Black to support a separate
standalone article; some of my efforts at verifying content and whether a 2005 news source is usable is further discussed at
the article talk page, including a review of various
promotional sources, including some that were removed several weeks before the nomination.
Beccaynr (
talk) 00:32, 12 February 2024 (UTC)update comment to reflect renamed article
Beccaynr (
talk) 07:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect Lacks separate notability from the FasciaBlaster.
Hemiauchenia (
talk) 00:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.