From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:38, 13 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Asha Daudi Abinallah

Asha Daudi Abinallah (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should have gone with A7 but there's one US press association interview that probably would have kiboshed that, so here's the AfD. Fails WP:GNG no evidence of notability. Alexandermcnabb ( talk) 07:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. Due to lack of notability, and I've searched. Additionally the article is in bad shape with a lack of citations, and no suggestion of notability. I agree with the nominator that a PROD would have been reasonable and I'd also support a speedy delete. CT55555 ( talk) 13:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Delete sources are insufficient. Does not meet notability. Craigwikiman ( talk) 18:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC) reply
    Blocked for UPE. MER-C 06:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC) reply
I have done some changes in the content, please check the updated version with required references and credible sources. Juma Sadala ( talk) 07:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.