The result was No Consensus to delete. While there is no consensus that the article content should be deleted the the balance of arguments favors covering him in the context of his notable father so I am redirecting the article as an editorial decision. Eluchil404 ( talk) 06:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Son and grandson of über-famous American generals but by all accounts this man sought to avoid the limelight and did. Much of the article is based on sources of questionable reliability that rely on hearsay which is unacceptable for a biography of a living person. Pichpich ( talk) 02:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Wiki entry on Arthur MacArthur IV is of tremendous historical significance and should be retained. References provided are the only ones available on MacArthur but the references are credible. The entry has been edited down to a bare minimum so it covers only the historical significance of the living entry. Arthur MacArthur is of significance because he is still alive and an established public figure. People want to know that, and Wiki now provides the only known bio information on this noted individual. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocoruff ( talk • contribs) 08:47, 23 July 2012