The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No sources exist, except for one which mentions that this school used to exist, but nothing else. No notability.
Likeanechointheforest (
talk) 21:16, 15 July 2021 (UTC)reply
keep: Sources(which apparently don't exist):
[1][2][3] The
Irish Examiner source counts as significant coverage. The
Irish Times source is borderline significant coverage in my opinion. these sources were easily found with a quick google search (which the nominator could easily have done per
WP:BEFORE) more may be found with a better search.
194.125.95.113 (
talk) 23:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Also found
this which I think counts as significant coverage
194.125.95.113 (
talk) 00:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Redirect or Merge To the target identified by ClemRutter. The Irish times is a long article, but mostly about other stuff. Same goes for the Irish examiner article. It's on a former cabinet members views about integrated education in general. Not about Armagh Integrated College. Which it only name drops. The rest of the references don't seem to be in-depth coverage either. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 10:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
I don't know which Examiner article you read (I linked two)
this one is entirely about the closure of this school.
this one has several hundred words about this school in particular. It's also worth pointing out that Mo Mowlam's comments were made at the opening of this school.
194.125.95.113 (
talk) 12:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
How is it relevant when or where Mo Mowlam made the comments? --
Adamant1 (
talk) 13:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
BTW, I changed my vote to redirect or merge since I missed the second Examiner article. I still think one of those is the best option. --
Adamant1 (
talk) 13:22, 17 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. Enough sources to satisfy
WP:GNG, as with pretty much any other secondary school in the western world. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep. It'll never be a huge article, but there are enough sources to establish notability per
WP:ORGDEPTH: these are more than mere trivial listings. I don't see a redirect as suggested as an improvement.
OsFish (
talk) 07:29, 22 July 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep, per
OsFish, having glanced at the sources. Enough for us to be able to build an article. /
Julle (
talk) 10:54, 22 July 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.