The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 06:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Procedural nomination. This was deleted at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Panesar in 2017. It was recently recreated as a draft, then moved to mainspace. It was tagged for speedy deletion under
WP:CSD#G4 as a recreation of content deleted at a discussion. The discussion was a bit thin -- only two editors, each commenting quite briefly. The only reason given was lack of demonstrated notability. The recreated version has more sources, including several more recent than the deletion discussion. I declined the speedy as not sufficiently identical with the previous version, but current notability seems less than clear cut to me, so I am bringing it here for a consensus decision on the current notability of this subject. I am not expressing any opinion at the moment on whether this should be kept, deleted, returned to draft, or redirected to the business which Panesar founded and runs (
Diabetes.co.uk).
DES(talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep - it seems hard to separate the person from what he's created, but there's enough there (including a book published by an reputable publisher) to indicate notability for him as an individual, distinct from the company.
Guettarda (
talk) 13:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete As demonstrated by
Bmbaker88 above, and my comment there, this fails to meet
WP:SIGCOV.
Edwardx (
talk) 13:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 02:38, 20 October 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.