The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 01:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Aries (journal)

Aries (journal) (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for what is a society journal. Slatersteven ( talk) 18:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 19:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Delete Non-notable and no citations to counter this. -- Micky ( talk) 02:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet - Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:40, 26 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Redirect to European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism. I found a good source to cover the journal in that article ( Western Esotericism: A Guide for the Perplexed, pp. 159–160), but I don't think it's enough to make the journal independently notable. Ffranc ( talk) 12:33, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep, indexed in Scopus, meets WP:NJOURNALS. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 14:12, 20 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep as per Headbomb. Midnightblueowl ( talk) 09:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep per the above. BD2412 T 03:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC) reply
• Keep as per Headbomb; also, the editor-in-chief was Wouter Hanegraaff (2001-2010). GenoV84 ( talk) 22:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.