The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 23:48, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previous
WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 00:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. Not an easy one. There is certainly coverage but it seems insufficient to sustain a BLP. Basically the same conclusion as nominator. My own analysis of references and sources. Hopefully this will make it easier to close.
gidonb (
talk) 23:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 00:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete, fails
WP:NBASIC. I agree with
gidonb, I can't find any sources that meet all of the notability criteria. SailingInABathTub~~🛁~~ 23:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.