From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 00:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Ari Zoldan

Ari Zoldan (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable, andpromotional Over-personal article, presumably with some kind of COI. The references are almost entirely to items he has written himself, except for an item in his university's alumni publication, not usually considered a sufficient reliable source for notability . DGG ( talk ) 23:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 00:25, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. Nothing stated in the article is an automatic pass of any Wikipedia notability criterion in the absence of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG, but the sourcing here doesn't clear GNG. The only source here that's about him in any non-trivial way is the alumni newsletter of his own alma mater, which is not a notability-assisting source, and everything else is a directory listing, a piece of his own writing or a source in which he's trivially namechecked as a giver of soundbite in an article about some other topic. A person gets a Wikipedia article by being the subject of reliable source coverage, not by getting quoted in coverage of other things or by being the author of his own sources. Bearcat ( talk) 18:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - promo of a non-notable. Atsme 📞 📧 19:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Delte a non-notable businessman. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.