The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep Nominator fails to advance a valid reason for deletion, per
WP:TOOLITTLE. We do not delete stub articles based on length or word count but rather notability, and the first three refs are reliable sources. Enough to meet
WP:GNG, imo. Now maybe there's a commonsense merge target....?
Shawn in Montreal (
talk) 05:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)reply
DeleteMerge I disagree with the nominators reasoning for deletion but in my opinion the Neural Engine itself isn't notable, the A11 chip is and therefore these two sentences should just be merged into the A11 article... EoRdE6(
Come Talk to Me!) 06:32, 12 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep At the time of the nomination this article does indeed appear to have been a stub... but that isn't a reason for deletion. It looks like some content has been added to the article after its listing here, maybe as a good faith effort to to stave off deletion, but the latest additions may need some editing as it reads a little like fluff. While the content could be merged into
Apple A11, I'm in favor of the article remaining a stand-alone article as I anticipate it will evolve along the lines of
Apple motion coprocessors. —
RP88(
talk) 09:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 13:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge the information itself is useful but not freestanding, merge into the A11 and
AI accelerator articles as appropriate.
Dbsseven (
talk) 16:24, 20 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Keep or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 12:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep This is a notable subject, and although it is related to the A11 it is sufficiently significant in its own right to deserve an article.
The king of the sun (
talk) 15:55, 25 October 2017 (UTC)reply
KeepMerge - Subject is definitely notable, nominator didn't specify a specific reason for deletion. Per
WP:TOOSOON. I wouldn't be opposed to merging it with
A11, if there is consensus for that. –
MilesEdgeworthTalk 17:38, 25 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Lots of sources. Unique and prominent feature to a high profile product. Probably not the last we'll hear of this from Apple. Probably a common feature to similar products in the future from other manufacturers/designers. --
Henriok (
talk) 19:26, 25 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge There are not enough sources that show the Apple Neural Engine is independently notably from the A11 chip. Merge is the best option.
-- HighKing++ 12:43, 26 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Apple A11. Unless we're making a special case because we all love every bit of every Apple product,
WP:NOTINHERITED seems to apply here, as may
WP:TOOSOON. References are all to tech-related sources, whilst
this one makes it clear the Neural Engine is a trademark-type name for an
element of the
Apple A11.
One source I found just dismisses the name as a "buzz-word". I must declare my lack of technical expertise here, but merging seems to make sense at this point in time.
Nick Moyes (
talk) 17:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge: This is a
AI accelerator, a topic which does not appear to have spawned any articles for the similar functionality found in, say, AMD. I suspect this will change in the future, especially as it will likely be incorporated into the A12 and so forth, but for now this is a feature of one architecture and should be covered there.
Maury Markowitz (
talk) 14:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge: I agree, we either merge it with the
AI accelerator article or the
Apple A11 article. I’d prefer merging with the A11 article. We’ll make a dedicated article when Apple makes more generations of this.
Darius robin (
talk) 16:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.