The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus expressed to delete the article, perhaps due to coverage under a different alias and nominator has since expressed favour at retention if renamed, which is supported by the only !vote offered. The renaming of an article is not a matter for AfD and if considered controversial could be discussed at WP:RM. (non-admin closure) Bungle ^{( talk • contribs)} 21:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Anwynn

Anwynn (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An IP editor attempted an AfD here but left it incomplete, which led me to try to straighten things out. This band changed their name to InHuman in 2020 and got some reviews under that name. As Anwynn they got very little reliable coverage. All I could find was a brief review in a long list of other bands: [1], and this interview: [2]. All else is from the usual metal directory sites. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:21, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Move to InHuman - if the band has received coverage in its new form (and so is notable) then the article should be kept. But we should reflect the band's current form and name. What's the coverage like? St★lwart ¹¹¹ 14:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The reviews of InHuman's 2021 album seem a bit more robust than anything Anwynn ever got, but they should still be inspected for reliability. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 14:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Yeah, a search is really difficult because "inhuman" brings up so many unrelated results. But I assume you mean stuff like this? St★lwart ¹¹¹ 01:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC) reply

• Comment from Nominator - If there are no further votes, I can accept the idea of transforming the article to focus on the band's current name with a "formerly known as..." history, and can do the move/update myself. Their current incarnation still has questionable notability though. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 15:35, 24 September 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.