From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde ( Talk) 21:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Anupam Mittal

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Anupam Mittal (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created anew and absolutely in good faith (see User_talk:Titodutta#Moving_of_Draft_into_mainspace) but the underlying issues of the prior AfDs remain. While not a G4, I don't think continuing as a judge on Shark Tank India is sufficient enough to cross the barrier he hadn't reached at the prior AfDs. If this closes as delete (or even a redirect) I think it should be protected to enforce AfC. Star Mississippi 04:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - I think it is enough. Given that there are many dubious pages which have been largely untouched since before 2007, I really don't see why this one is coming around again so quickly. JMWt ( talk) 08:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep: plenty of significant coverage here. Suspicions about the creator of the article might go somewhere, but they do not go to notability. Moonraker ( talk) 20:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:18, 4 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Keep: A search brings up plenty of independent coverage. I agree with Moonraker that past issues with this article's creation are not an issue for AfD. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 15:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting for a more clear consensus. It looks like consensus may develop to keep, and more participation might help make this clear.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller ( talk) 16:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Definite Delete: All of his coverage is routine for Shark Tank show and not what he is notable, that’s why his page is getting rejected from the last 5 years. His PR team has been trying to hire news publication & their people to get news published about him. He is a non-notable entrepreneur similar to everyone out there whose company got funded. Block his page creation. I am sure, after seeing this delete vote, he will hire more people to have a Keep vote. 2409:40D4:1004:F9B6:E9FC:9313:DB65:AA3C ( talk) 05:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Keep- @ 2409:40D4:1004:F9B6:E9FC:9313:DB65:AA3C: I think we should channel our attention more on the subjects if it meets notability or not, than assumptions of paid PR without evidence. From sources he has presently there seems to be enough to prove notability. Epcc12345 ( talk) 06:50, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
He definitely fails notability as an entrepreneur, no company where he has executive role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40D4:1004:F9B6:E9FC:9313:DB65:AA3C ( talk) 13:14, 13 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anupam_Mittal_(3rd_nomination)&oldid=1145571913"