- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and redirect to Central Information Commission. Although there may be sufficient notability here, I agree with The Bushranger that the current "article" is unsalvagable. Therefore I think deletion (and a redirect as suggested by Abecedare) is the best solution, but without prejudice to recreation if sufficient sources can be found. Randykitty ( talk) 11:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Anugraha Narayan Tiwari
- Anugraha Narayan Tiwari ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
there is an assertion of notability, but there are few sources. lifelong bureaucrat not in a high profile job except for the last two months before retirement, there looks to be little genuine notability with this cv masquerading as a bio Ohc ¡digame! 03:14, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 15:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Very senior civil servant at a level which should give him automatic notability (and certainly would do if he was at this level in the USA or UK). -- Necrothesp ( talk) 15:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep Mess of an article, but he had significant roles at a high enough level to establish his notability, per Necrothesp. — innotata 04:44, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to recreation per WP:TNT - while he does appear to be notable the article as it stands is unsalvagable; it would be best to WP:BLOWITUP and start over. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty ( talk) 16:50, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Tom Morris ( talk) 06:49, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Redirect to Central Information Commission The current article is a huge mess, but I could see it being reduced to a one liner in the form of "is a Indian Civil Service officer who served as the Chief Information Commissioner of India's Central Information Commission from Sep-Dec 2010" (note that that final post is the highest post held by the subject). However when one notes that the relevant source glosses this as, "Information Commissioner A. N. Tiwari will take over as the new Chief Information Commissioner on Thursday, succeeding Wajahat Habibullah. He will, however, hold the job only till December 19 this year when he is due to retire, and this is, therefore, virtually a stop-gap arrangement", even this one liner seems excessive, and a redirect should suffice. Abecedare ( talk) 18:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.