The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 10:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Antonia Li

Antonia Li (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no actual accomplishment of her own- the content is name dropping with brands she advertises on her social media. This seems a matter of both notability and promotionalism . DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep as being the founder of a company and the recipient of the Red Dot Award seems to merit more success and notability than "advertisements on her social media." -- Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 03:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 03:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 03:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 03:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Willthacheerleader18 ( talk) 03:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• Keep: She started a graphic design/advertising agency five years ago, and from the current sources, appears to be getting attention in her field. The nominator says that she advertises brands on "her social media", which I think is a misreading. Planning social media campaigns for major brands is not the same thing as posting pictures on your own social media account; it's an actual job. -- Toughpigs ( talk) 04:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete have any of the Keep vote!s actually read the refs. There is a self indulgent fawning piece from the Hong Kong Tatler which is actually just a perfume advert, another fawning interview from Prestige, another society piece from Elle Hong Kong, a puff piece from generationT, I couldn't find the relevant source in Press Reader but my guess is it isn't a serious piece of commentary. The yahoo ref simply links back to the Elle puff piece and another is a micro biog care of the Hong Kong Tatler (again). Then we have just giving. Why do rich young entrepreneurs think that by giving away some money will make them notable, it doesn't. This is all a marketing puff piece for a rich young woman who may well shine in the social lime-light of Hong Kong but whose notability credentials stack up to nothing here.   Velella   ^{Velella Talk}   04:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Does not meet WP:GNG - the articles are press releases or otherwise similar puff pieces. Obviously notability is not inherited from her parents or where she went to school, or the companies she is involved with. The JustGiving link is just a fundraising link. -- Mr. Vernon ( talk) 04:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Does not meet WP:GNG. Underwaterbuffalo ( talk) 11:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete Vanity piece and advertising, and fails WP:NBUSINESSPEOPLE. The sources don't demonstrate any notability. Ambrosiawater ( talk) 18:07, 18 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• Delete - per nom and does not meet WP:GNG - MA Javadi ( talk) 17:52, 21 February 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.