From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer ( Talk: Contribs) 21:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Annika Duckmark

Annika Duckmark (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: GNG, has only won a national beauty pageant (see WP:1EVENT). No other significant achievement since. Fails WP:NMODEL. Dan arndt ( talk) 10:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 10:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 10:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 10:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz ( talk) 10:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Was Top 10 in Miss Universe 1996. Has been a TV presenter both for TV4 and TV1000. References shows notability. Per WP: GNG and WP:NENT. The Top 10 placement alone in a televised event with over a billion viewers are WP:GNH treshold. Then add her work on TV for amain broadcaster. BabbaQ ( talk) 11:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Delete beauty queens are not default notable. The TV presenter roles are not enough to show notability. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 01:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • POV does not trump guidelines and WP:GNG and WP:ENENT is met. Your drive-by !votes must have substance. Seems like you did not care to read neither the article nor the references. Guidelines are used to guide us to what is notable. BabbaQ ( talk) 16:06, 20 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • None of the references are enough to establish notability. Your attempts to create walled gardens to protect your pet projects from broad editorial inquiry is what has led to Wikipedia having an overabundance of articles on people who are not at all notable. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 21:10, 21 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, this woman was once crowned Miss Sweden, that's definitely very notable. Article could definitely use some expanding though. Davidgoodheart ( talk) 05:19, 22 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - was top 10 in an international pageant, also went on to have a career in TV presenting. MurielMary ( talk) 00:14, 23 April 2019 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:42, 25 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • I think that the sourcing and her TV work, plus Miss Universe top10 placement are adequate. BabbaQ ( talk) 00:05, 26 April 2019 (UTC) reply
  • Keep She easily passes WP:ANYBIO Major award - She was crowned as Miss Sweden in 1996 Lubbad85 ( ) 03:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.