The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
De-prodded without rationale. Original nomination was Appears to fail
WP:NAUTHOR due to lack of major reviews or other significant coverage in independent, reliable sources.SITH(talk) 21:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete It's not often a database search for a name comes up with zero hits, but that's what's happened here. The name is a pseudonym, apparently. More importantly, there seems to be little to no coverage of what appear to be self-published (iUniverse, etc) books, so there's no clear path to notability under
WP:AUTHOR or
WP:GNG.
Bakazaka (
talk) 22:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails
WP:AUTHOR. A pseudonym could pass WP:AUTHOR, bu tit would have to have
WP:SIGCOV, which this writer and her books lack.23:03, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
E.M.Gregory (
talk)
Delete Self-promotion is my belief. Style of writing suggests page created by this person.
Equine-man (
talk) 22:41, 15 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.