From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi ( talk) 12:54, 21 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Anita Natacha Akide

Anita Natacha Akide (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Keep There are enough reliable sources to verify the facts in the article. Alien Superstar ( talk) 23:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply

*Comment @ User:Reading Beans How can you say that the article has been created by a page paid editor, what proof do you have that that editor has made this article with money, yes if you think that the article should be deleted and it is according to the guideline of wikipedia If not made then you can write for it but you have no right, you can call any editor as paid editor. WP:EDITWARRING do edit warring without any strong evidence. 🦁 Lionfox 🏹 0909 ( talk) 14:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC) - strike sock - Beccaynr ( talk) 17:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Lionfox0909, what does edit warring got to do with with undisclosed paid editing? Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 10:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Keep A lot of independent reliable source with significant coverage. [1], [2], [3] and [4] are enough to establish notability. Kasar Wuya ( talk) 10:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Strike sock. Onel5969 TT me 21:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Draftify The current version of the article should be kept away from our readers. Lurking shadow ( talk) 11:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC) reply

*Draftify Doing a single notable deed cannot proof you notable WP:BLP1E. D 🐕 B 🦇K🐞 ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC) - strike sock - Beccaynr ( talk) 17:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete Most of the sources are name drops, or confirmation she was on the TV show, being involved with a charity really isn't anything beyond a few lines. Socks tell me this isn't notable. Oaktree b ( talk) 16:42, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per the above explanation of User:Beccaynr, which clearly provide evidence of Notability existence. An@ss_koko (speak up) 18:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Keep per Beccaynr - the coverage of the subject is indepth and reliable. And somewhere it meets WP:BASIC. See the news articles from reliable websites like US Weekly, Monsters & Critics, The Vanguard, PMNews, Nigerian Tribune. Shankyamber ( talk) 06:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC) reply
    And those sources are quoting what she said. Not in-depth for a BLP. And by the way, are you not the creator of the article? Best, Reading Beans ( talk) 04:09, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
Content creators can participate in deletion discussions, just like any other editor. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 14 November 2022 (UTC) reply
I mean so long as we keep it civil, any ideas help move the discussion forward. I'd not worry about it. Oaktree b ( talk) 00:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.