The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠
PMC♠
(talk) 03:27, 31 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Keep The significance of the person is as a videoblogger and entrepreneur. There are authoritative sources on the profile media of Ukraine: Focus, Expert, etc. All spam from the article has already been cleared.
213.87.131.131 (
talk) 15:11, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
User is a
WP:SPA who has no idea what or how the notability criteria is applied. scope_creepTalk 16:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No RS have yet been provided at this AfD that would confirm GNG; try a re-list
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Britishfinance (
talk) 01:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete lacking enough substantial coverage to establish GNG. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 14:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete. Fails
WP:SIGCOV, It lacks sufficient coverage to establish the direction of general importance.-Nahal(T) 23:30, 30 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.