The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 10:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Pushes the boundary of
WP:NBIO - a businessperson involved in some merger transactions, but is it really encyclopedic? The community should have a voice on this. The mergers history seems about as notable as the 1990s bagels sales – not very. ☆
Bri (
talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep he is notable with considerable press, I was able to find dozens of references
Chamber chamber (
talk) 17:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep mergers are significant and subject has dozens of citations--
FrankTursetta (
talk) 14:58, 20 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep the subject has attained
WP:SIGCOV; forget the bagels – his work with Deutsche Boerse, NASDAQ, NYSE and LSE alone is certainly notable and recognized as such in plenty of well established
News Orgs.
Bienmanchot (
talk) 23:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete -- does not meet
WP:ANYBIO; has not accomplished anything notable or significant. Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 01:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Comment According to plenty of sources
123, M&A Boutiques like Bednar's (ranked #3 among top boutiques of 2017
4) are doing real damage to Wall Street, gaining
WP:SIGCOV along the way. Not to incite
WP:OSE, but as cofounder of his firm
5, even if you ignored his many other significant contributions to the field (see
refs on page), Bednar is clearly notable, and ~90% of top boutique founders have entries. This isn't far fetched, and it doesn't warrant the
WP:JNN reasoning provided above.--
Chamber chamber (
talk) 00:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep passes
WP:GNG and Comment validates the argument--
JAMillerKC (
talk) 19:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.