From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 10:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Andrew Bednar

Andrew Bednar (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pushes the boundary of WP:NBIO - a businessperson involved in some merger transactions, but is it really encyclopedic? The community should have a voice on this. The mergers history seems about as notable as the 1990s bagels sales – not very. ☆ Bri ( talk) 06:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ ( talk) 16:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ ( talk) 16:07, 19 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete -- does not meet WP:ANYBIO; has not accomplished anything notable or significant. Wikipedia is not a resume hosting service. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  09:23, 26 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Comment According to plenty of sources 1 2 3, M&A Boutiques like Bednar's (ranked #3 among top boutiques of 2017 4) are doing real damage to Wall Street, gaining WP:SIGCOV along the way. Not to incite WP:OSE, but as cofounder of his firm 5, even if you ignored his many other significant contributions to the field (see refs on page), Bednar is clearly notable, and ~90% of top boutique founders have entries. This isn't far fetched, and it doesn't warrant the WP:JNN reasoning provided above.-- Chamber chamber ( talk) 00:24, 30 November 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes WP:GNG and Comment validates the argument-- JAMillerKC ( talk) 19:59, 2 December 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.