The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
Oswald Foundation. The target's notability can be discussed separately but does not impede a merge close here SoWhy 15:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Lots of references and superficially impressive, but am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage. Fails
WP:BIO.
Edwardx (
talk) 20:05, 5 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Oswald Foundation. Nothing shows any real notability except for the Oswald Foundation. President of a secondary school computer club? Volunteer at an organization? Someone's reaching for notability here, and there's more than a whiff of undeclared paid editing.
Ravensfire (
talk) 21:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Note - next question is if the Oswald Foundation is notable. Questionable on that, especially with the undeclared COI around these articles.
Ravensfire (
talk) 12:03, 7 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Hi, this is Anand here from the article. I second with
Ravensfire, notability is absolutely questionable, but my opinion is irrelevant as COI. Please feel free to merge or delete the article. Just putting it out there, I didn't pay someone to edit it. :) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
AnandChowdhary0 (
talk •
contribs) 08:29, 9 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete no evidence that Chowdhary is notable as an individual.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 03:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.