- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 22:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
An Erotic Werewolf in London
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- An Erotic Werewolf in London ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A film that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. The only reference included in the current article is not a valid review, as it is from a non-notable blog rather than a reliable source. I did some searches for any kind of significant coverage or reviews, and I actually did find one good source, this book has a full entry on it. However, beyond that I was unable to find anything beyond very brief mentions of the title, and one source is generally not enough to establish notability. As neither the writer/director or production company are notable themselves, there is no target for a Redirect or Merge as an WP:ATD. I am bringing it to AFD rather than simply WP:PRODing it, in case anyone else has more success in finding additional reliable sources. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma ( talk) 21:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as there is a lack of reliable sources coverage. There are some reviews listed here but unfortunately I don't recognise any of those sources as reliable. If someone disagrees I'm willing to reassess my vote, imv Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Cannot find anything more in Google. Does not meet WP:NFILM. Zeddedm ( talk) 04:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as lacking sufficient coverage. Not your siblings' deletionist ( talk) 21:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.