The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 16:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Non-notable story-teller and brand coach. Ref's are mix of press releases and syndicate feeds. No effective coverage per
WP:SIGCOV and
WP:BIO. scope_creepTalk
I saw these, they are not the best. One is blog. Three of these are syndicated feeds (him talking), one is twitter feed, one is a single sentence, one is him as resident complaining about the noise of construction, One is the The Dubai Health Awards which is not him and one is a LinkedIn article by him, that is syndicated as a feed. The first ref is a real secondary ref, but the rank are not the best nor highest quality refs. scope_creepTalk 23:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - the coverage seems to be much broader than deep. Changing my !vote.
Bearian (
talk) 20:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - despite the
WP:REFBOMBING characteristic of this editor's creations, the subject does not appear to me to pass
WP:GNG. Also very likely
WP:UPE. --Begoon 07:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.