The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
✗plicit 14:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
This topic fails
WP:GNG and is nothing more than one of the many schemes derived by physicians to predict dementia-afflicted EOL patient outcomes in a better manner. It is not good when you can't find anyone other than Aminoff discussing the syndrome across any peer-reviewed media in significant detail. Some interesting comments over
here (p. 1741 and 1742.)
TrangaBellam (
talk) 09:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete or redirect to the article on Aminoff.
Fram (
talk) 09:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Agree that there is insufficient recognition by anyone other than Aminoff. Fails
WP:GNG-- rsjaffe🗩🖉 17:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - Too few mentions in RSes and not enough independent recognition. And most of the sources used in the article are PRIMARY, creating a misleading sense of notability. —
Shibbolethink(
♔♕) 01:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)reply
I'd also say that the page
Bechor Zvi Aminoff looks fishy. Created, infobox and all, by a new editors' 10th edit? No sign of passing
WP:PROF, either.
XOR'easter (
talk) 01:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.