The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
An unencyclopedic article on a self-published iUniverse book that fails
WP:BK.
Victoriagirl 01:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete WP:BOOK. Please also nominate its author page
Raul Ramos y Sanchez for WP:BIO failure as only notibility is this book, which isn't notable (yet).--
Dacium 01:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep A published novel has God knows how many readers and so definitely deserves inclusion in an encyclopedia. --
172.129.74.92 02:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Comment Above anonymous user has voted "Speedy Keep" in a slew of AfD. His votes should be ignored as bad faith and disruption.
JuJube 02:40, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete. If "God knows" how many people read this book, perhaps He can provide some sources to that effect. Lacking the same omniscient oversight - or at least reliable sources - means I have to opine to delete.
Arkyan •
(talk) 14:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)reply
Delete The only reason a self published book should be included is if there is substantial verifiable evidence of many copies sold and critical approval. While simply being a self published book is not bad, the burden is on the book to prove itself as notable, rather than the author. --
Entoaggie09 04:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.