The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 19:10, 2 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary article split that
goes into too much detail about in-universe details and fails to justify its existence through reliable sources needed to pass
WP:GNG. I don't even know if it's possible to establish independent notability for such a split because any sources, should they even exist, would likely be weighted towards one particular interpretation or another rather than the whole grouping. This should be a two to three paragraph section in the main article at best, but I don't think any existing content is worthy of being merged. It should be started from scratch.
TTN (
talk) 15:28, 26 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as a
WP:CONTENTFORK that does not meet the
WP:GNG, due to a lack of reliable third party sources. There is already an article about this character, and it's not in the best shape, requiring lots of sources, and treading much of the same ground as this. What does or does not qualify as an "alternate version" is
WP:OR, and that type of subjectivity is easily resolved by not forking this from the main article.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 15:53, 26 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. Massive pile of
WP:OR. While it could possibly be a paragraph or two in the main article, this article is not that content.
WP:TNT it.
Hog FarmBacon 18:24, 26 August 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete: Article does not meet
WP:GNG and
WP:BEFORE showed nothing that meets
WP:SIGCOV. Article itself is mostly (all)
WP:OR based on primary sources. //
Timothy :: talk 14:44, 29 August 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.