The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
As with the various other AfDs on these topics, this is an unnecessary plot split that fails
WP:NOTPLOT. It does not possess non-trivial coverage needed to establish notability per
WP:GNG. It should be summarized in the main topic, but there really isn't any worth in merging the existing content.
TTN (
talk) 20:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Fails GNG. Not really anything to merge when the article is
WP:ALLPLOT.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 17:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge as per consensus. The only coverage is plot information which is what Wikipedia articles are
WP:NOT. No non-trivial coverage in reliable sources to establish notability as asked by the
WP:GNG.
Jontesta (
talk) 20:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as this fails
WP:GNG. There is nothing to merge as this is already covered at the main article.
Shooterwalker (
talk) 18:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - While I have no objection to information on particularly notable versions of Doom that have been documented in reliable, secondary sources being added to
Doctor Doom, information from this article should not be merged there in order to do so, as there are no secondary sources being used here.
Rorshacma (
talk) 17:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Doctor Doom; this isn't notable in its own right and I suspect it is only a separate article in the first place due to its
extreme length. jp×g 16:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.