The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not a serious article. Possibly speedy-worthy.
JaGatalk 05:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Google, Google News, Google books search doesn't provide sources for its existence.--
Lenticel(
talk) 05:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - There's almost no content to the article at all!
BecauseWhy? (
talk) 09:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete as failing
WP:V. What content there is seems to be entirely lies and the single unverifiable source does little to demonstrate otherwise. ~
mazcat|
c 19:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete Non-notable at best, possible hoax.
Edward321 (
talk) 23:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.