The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
nice alt account buddy, you should consider getting you're brain fixed if you think this no casualties mean no article. GNG also states that this article is good.
2604:3D08:4C7F:DA00:4826:B283:76C1:AE6F (
talk) 15:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The main problem isn't no casualties. The problem is no significant media coverage and lasting effects. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (
talk|
contribs) 15:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. There was just one collective news story about this event when it happened.
Sunnya343 (
talk) 00:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.